Work–life balance
| This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (December 2009) |
|
|
The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please improve this article and discuss the issue on the talk page. (December 2010) |
Work–life balance is a broad concept including proper prioritizing between "work" (career and ambition) on one hand and "life" (Health, pleasure, leisure, family and spiritual development) on the other. Related, though broader, terms include "lifestyle balance" and "life balance".
Contents[hide] |
[edit] History
The expression was first used in the late 1970s to describe the balance between an individual's work and personal life.[1] In the United States, this phrase was first used in 1986.
Over the past twenty-five years, there has been a substantial increase in work which is felt to be due, in part, by information technology and by an intense, competitive work environment. Long-term loyalty and a "sense of corporate community" have been eroded by a performance culture that expects more and more from their employees yet offers little security in return.
Many experts predicted that technology would eliminate most household chores and provide people with much more time to enjoy leisure activities; but many ignore this option, encouraged by prevailing consumerist culture and a political agenda that has "elevated the work ethic to unprecedented heights and thereby reinforced the low value and worth attached to parenting".[citation needed]
Many Americans are experiencing burnout due to overwork and increased stress. This condition is seen in nearly all occupations from blue collar workers to upper management. Over the past decade, a rise in workplace violence, an increase in levels of absenteeism as well as rising workers’ compensation claims are all evidence of an unhealthy work life balance.[citation needed]
Employee assistance professionals say there are many causes for this situation ranging from personal ambition and the pressure of family obligations to the accelerating pace of technology.[1]. According to a recent study for the Center for Work-Life Policy, 1.7 million people consider their jobs and their work hours excessive because of globalization.
These difficult and exhausting conditions are having adverse effects. According to the study, fifty percent of top corporate executives are leaving their current positions. Although sixty-four percent of workers feel that their work pressures are "self-inflicted", they state that it is taking a toll on them. The study shows that seventy percent of US respondents and eighty-one percent of global respondents say their jobs are affecting their health.
Between forty-six and fifty-nine percent of workers feel that stress is affecting their interpersonal and sexual relationships. Additionally, men feel that there is a certain stigma associated with saying "I can't do this".
[edit] United States history
[edit] Work statistics
According to a survey conducted by the National Life Insurance Company, four out of ten employees state that their jobs are "very" or "extremely" stressful.[2] Those in high-stress jobs are three times more likely than others to suffer from stress-related medical conditions and are twice as likely to quit. The study states that women, in particular, report stress related to the conflict between work and family.
[edit] Stress and work-life balance
The number of stress-related disability claims by American employees has doubled[when?] according to the Employee Assistance Professionals Association in Arlington, Virginia. Seventy-five to ninety percent of physician visits are related to stress and, according to the American Institute of Stress, the cost to industry has been estimated at $200 billion-$300 billion a year.[3]
Steven L. Sauter, chief of the Applied Psychology and Ergonomics Branch of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in Cincinnati, Ohio, states that recent studies show that "the workplace has become the single greatest source of stress".[4] Michael Feuerstein, professor of clinical psychology at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences at Bethesda Naval Hospital states, "We're seeing a greater increase in work-related neuroskeletal disorders from a combination of stress and ergonomic stressors".[5]
It is clear that problems caused by stress have become a major concern to both employers and employees. Symptoms of stress are manifested both physiologically and psychologically. Persistent stress can result in cardiovascular disease, sexual health problems, a weaker immune system and frequent headaches, stiff muscles, or backache. It can also result in poor coping skills, irritability, jumpiness, insecurity, exhaustion, and difficulty concentrating. Stress may also perpetuate or lead to binge eating, smoking, and alcohol consumption.
According to James Campbell Quick, a professor of organizational behavior at the University of Texas-Arlington, "The average tenure of presidents at land-grant universities in the past ten years has dropped from approximately seven to three-and-a-half years".[6]
The feeling that simply working hard is not enough anymore is acknowledged by many other American workers. “To get ahead, a seventy-hour work week is the new standard. What little time is left is often divvied up among relationships, kids, and sleep.” [7] This increase in work hours over the past two decades means that less time will be spent with family, friends, and community as well as pursuing activities that one enjoys and taking the time to grow personally and spiritually.[citation needed]
Texas Quick, an expert witness at trials of companies who were accused of overworking their employees, states that “when people get worked beyond their capacity, companies pay the price.” [8] Although some employers believe that workers should reduce their own stress by simplifying their lives and making a better effort to care for their health, most experts feel that the chief responsibility for reducing stress should be management.
According to Esther M. Orioli, president of Essi Systems, a stress management consulting firm, “Traditional stress-management programs placed the responsibility of reducing stress on the individual rather than on the organization-where it belongs. No matter how healthy individual employees are when they start out, if they work in a dysfunctional system, they’ll burn out.” [9]
[edit] Gender differences regarding work-life balance
According to Sylvia Hewlett, president of the Center for Work-Life Policy, if a woman takes time off to care for children or an older parent, employers tend to “see these people as less than fully committed. It’s as though their identity is transformed.” [10]
Brett Graff, Nightly Business Report correspondent states that (because a woman may have trouble re-entering the market or, if she does find a position, it will likely be a lower position with less pay). “If you thought choosing a baby name was hard, you have yet to wrestle with the idea of leaving your career to be a full-time mom or take care of an older parent…Most will want to reenter, but will do so accepting lesser positions or lower wages.” [11]
This circumstance only increases the work-life balance stress experienced by many women employees.
Research conducted by the Kenexa Research Institute (KRI), a division of Kenexa, evaluated how male and female workers perceive work-life balance and found that women are more positive than men in how they perceive their company’s efforts to help them balance work and life responsibilities. The report is based on the analysis of data drawn from a representative sample of 10,000 U.S. workers who were surveyed through WorkTrends, KRI’s annual survey of worker opinions.
The results indicated a shift in women’s perceptions about work-life balance. In the past, women often found it more difficult to maintain balance due to the competing pressures at work and demands at home. [12]
[edit] Work-life balance concerns of men and women alike
Similar discrimination is experienced by men who take time off or reduce working hours for taking care of the family.
For many employees today—both male and female—their lives are becoming more consumed with a host of family and other personal responsibilities and interests. Therefore, in an effort to retain employees, it is increasingly important for organizations to recognize this balance. [13]
[edit] Young generation views on work-life balance
According to Kathleen Gerson, Sociologist, young people “are searching for new ways to define care that do not force them to choose between spending time with their children and earning an income" and “ are looking for definition of personal identity that do not pit their own development against creating committed ties to others".[2][3] Young adults believe that parents should get involved and support the children both economically and emotionally, as well as share labor equally. Young people do not believe work-life balance is possible and think it is dangerous to build a life dependent on another when relationships are unpredictable. They are looking for partners to share the house work and family work together.[3][4] Both men and women believe that women should have jobs before considering marriage; for better life and to be happy in marriage. Young people do not think their mother’s generations were unhappy and no power because they were not economically dependent.
[edit] Identity through work
[edit] Women
Today there are many young women who do not want to just stay at home and do house work, but want to have their careers. In fact, women may lose their self-esteem and identities when they stay at home; young women hope that their lives will include strong ties to the workplace.[3][4]
[edit] Men
Men know that work alone may not provide their lives with meaning. Young men can lose their meaning of life; they want a balance between paid work and personal attachments without being victimized at work.[3] [4]
[edit] Facts
Regarding home life, men and women have similarities with work and home life. Today, home is not a heavenly place which men and women could rest and feel comfort as before, but home is an additional place of work.[3] [5]
[edit] Work-life balance issues and their influence on children
An increasing number of young children are being raised by a childcare provider or another person other than a parent; older children are more likely today to come home to an empty house and spend time with video games, television and the internet with less guidance to offset or control the messages coming from these sources.
No one knows how many kids are home after school without an adult, but they know the number is in the millions. Also, according to a study by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the “more time that children spent in child care, the more likely their sixth grade teachers were to report behavor problems.” [14] The findings are the results of the largest study of child care and development conducted in the United States; the analysis tracked 1,364 children from birth.
[edit] Consequences of an Imbalance
Mental health is a balancing act that may be affected by four factors: the influence of unfavourable genes, by wounding trauma, by private pressures and most recently by the stress of working. [6] Many people expose themselves unsolicited to the so-called job stress, because the "hard worker" enjoys a very high social recognition. These aspects can be the cause of an imbalance in the areas of life. But there are also other reasons which can lead to such an imbalance.
Remarkable is for example the increase in non-occupational activities with obligation character, which include mainly house and garden work, maintenance and support of family members or volunteer activities. All this can contribute to the perception of a chronic lack of time. [7] This time pressure is, amongst others, influenced by the own age, the age and number of children in the household, marital status, the profession and level of employment as well as the income level. [8] The psychological strain, which in turn affects the healthiness, increases due to the strong pressure of time, but also by the complexity of work, growing responsibilities, concern for long-term existential protection and more. [9] The mentioned stresses and straints could lead in the long term to irreversible, physical signs of wear as well as to negative effects on the human cardiovascular and immune systems. [10]
Psychoanalysts diagnose uncertainty as the dominant attitude to life in the postmodern society. [11] This uncertainty can be caused by the pressure which is executed from the society to the humans. It is the uncertainty to fail, but also the fear of the own limits, not to achieve something what the society expects, and especially the desire for recognition in all areas of life. [12] In today's society we are in a permanent competition. Appearance, occupation, education of the children - everything is compared to a media staged ideal. Everything should be perfect, because this deep-rooted aversion to all average, the pathological pursue to excellence - these are old traditions. [13] Who ever wants more - on the job, from the partner, from the children, from themselves - will one day be burned out and empty inside. He is then faced with the realization that perfection do not exist. [14] Who is nowadays empty inside and burned out, has in the common language a Burnout. But due to the definitional problems Burnout is till this date no recognized illness. [15] An attempt to define this concept more closely, can be: a condition that get only the passionate, that is certainly not a mental illness but only a grave exhaustion (but, lo and behold, can lead to numerous sick days). [16] It can benefited to the term that it is a disease model which is socially acceptable and also, to some extent, the individual self-esteem stabilizing. This finding in turn facilitates many undetected depressed people, the way to a qualified treatment. [17] According to experts in the field are, in addition to the ultra hard-working and the idealists mainly the perfectionist, the loner, the grim and the thin-skinned, especially endangered of a burnout. All together they usu-ally have a lack of a healthy distance to work. [18]
Another factor is also, that for example decision-makers in government offices and upper echelons are not allowed to show weaknesses or signs of disease etc., because this would immediately lead to doubts of the ability for further responsibility. It should be noted that only 20% of managers (e.g. in Germany) do sports regu-larly and also only 2% keep regularly preventive medical check-up. [19] In such a position other priorities seem to be set and the time lacks for regular sports. Frightening is that the job has such a high priority, that people waive screening as a sign of weakness. In contrast to that, the burnout syndrome seems to be gaining popularity. There seems nothing to be ashamed to show weaknesses, but quite the opposite: The burnout is part of a successful career like a home for the role model family. [20] Besides that the statement which describes the burnout as a "socially recognized precious version of the depression and despair that lets also at the moment of failure the self-image intact" fits and therefore concludes "Only losers become depressed, burnout against it is a diagnosis for winners, more precisely, for former winners.”. [21]
However, it is fact that four out of five Germans complain about too much stress. One in six under 60 swallows at least once a week, a pill for the soul, whether it is against insomnia, depression or just for a bit more drive in the stressful everyday life. [22] The phases of burnout can be described, among other things, first by great ambition, then follows the suppression of failure, isolation and finally, the cynical attitude towards the employer or supervisor. Concerned persons have very often also anxiety disorders and depressions, which are serious mental diseases. Depressions are the predominant causes of the nearly 10,000 suicides that occur alone each year in Germany. [23] The implications of such imbalances can be further measured in figures: In 1993, early retirement due to mental illness still made 15.4 percent of all cases. In 2008, there were already 35.6 percent. Even in the days of illness, the proportion of failures due to mental disorders increased. Statisticians calculated that 41 million absent days in 2008 went to the account of these crises, which led to 3.9 billion euros in lost production costs. [24] For companies it is time to act and support their employees with a healthy work-life-balance.
[edit] Responsibility of the employer
Companies have begun to realize how important the work-life balance is to the productivity and creativity of their employees. Research by Kenexa Research Institute in 2007 shows that those employees who were more favorable toward their organization’s efforts to support work-life balance also indicated a much lower intent to leave the organization, greater pride in their organization, a willingness to recommend it as a place to work and higher overall job satisfaction.
Employers can offer a range of different programs and initiatives, such as flexible working arrangements in the form of part time, casual and telecommuting work. More proactive employers can provide compulsory leave, strict maximum hours and foster an environment that encourages employees not to continue working after hours.
It is generally only highly skilled workers that can enjoy such benefits as written in their contracts, although many professional fields would not go so far as to discourage workaholic behaviour. Unskilled workers will almost always have to rely on bare minimum legal requirements. The legal requirements are low in many countries, in particular, the United States. In contrast, the European Union has gone quite far in assuring a legal work-life balance framework, for example pertaining to parental leave and the non-discrimination of part-time workers.
According to Stewart Friedman -- professor of Management and founding director of the Wharton School’s Leadership Program and of its Work/Life Integration Project—a "one size fits all” mentality in human resources management often perpetuates frustration among employees. “[It’s not an] uncommon problem in many HR areas where, for the sake of equality, there's a standard policy that is implemented in a way that's universally applicable -- [even though] everyone's life is different and everyone needs different things in terms of how to integrate the different pieces. It's got to be customized.” [25]
Friedman’s research indicates that the solution lies in approaching the components of work, home, community, and self as a comprehensive system. Instead of taking a zero-sum approach, Friedman’s Total Leadership program teaches professionals how to successfully pursue “four-way wins” -- improved performance across all parts of life.
[edit] Global comparisons
According to a new study by Harvard and McGill University researchers, the United States lags far behind nearly all wealthy countries when it comes to family-oriented workplace policies such as maternity leave, paid sick days and support for breast feeding. Jody Heyman, founder of the Harvard-based Project on Global Working Families and director of McGill’s Institute for Health and Social Policy, states that, “More countries are providing the workplace protections that millions of Americans can only dream of. The U.S. has been a proud leader in adopting laws that provide for equal opportunity in the workplace, but our work/family protections are among the worst.” [26]
This observation is being shared by many Americans today and is considered by many experts to be indicative of the current climate. However, the U.S. Labor Department is examining regulations that give workers unpaid leave to deal with family or medical emergencies (a review that supporters of the FMLA worry might be a prelude to scaling back these protections, as requested by some business groups). At the same time, Senator Chris Dodd from Connecticut is proposing new legislation that would enable workers to take six weeks of paid leave. Congress is also expected to reconsider the Healthy Families Act which is a bill that would require employers with at least fifteen employees to provide seven paid sick days per year.[26]
At the state level, California has paid family leave benefits for its workers. New Jersey lawmakers are pushing legislation that would make their state the second state to add this worker benefit. Under one New Jersey proposal, workers who take leave would be paid through the state’s temporary disability insurance fund, “augmented by a 0.1 percent charge on workers’ weekly wages.”[27] Traditionally, many conservatives have opposed paid family leave, but there is a sign that this mindset is beginning to change. Reverend Paul Schenck, a prominent member of the National Pro-Life Action Center recently stated that he would support paid maternity leave on the assumption that it might encourage women to follow through with their pregnancies instead of having abortions. According to Heyman, “Across the political spectrum, people are realizing these policies have an enormous impact on working families. If you look at the most competitive economies in the world, all the others except the U.S. have these policies in place.” [27]
The United States is not as workplace family-oriented as many other wealthy countries. According to a study released by Harvard and McGill University researchers in February 2007, workplace policies for families in the U.S. are weaker than those of all high-income countries and even many middle-and low-income countries.
For example, the study notes that the United States is one of only five countries out of 173 that does not guarantee some form of paid maternity leave. (The other countries are Lesotho, Liberia, Swaziland, and Papua New Guinea).[27] Other differences include the fact that fathers are granted paid paternity leave or paid parental leave in sixty-five countries; thirty one of these countries offer at least fourteen weeks of paid leave. The U.S. does not guarantee this to fathers.
At least 107 countries protect working women’s right to breast-feed and, in at least seventy-three of them, women are paid. The U.S. does not have any federal legislation guaranteeing mothers the right to breast-feed their infants at work. When it comes to sick days, 145 countries provide sick days to their employees; 127 provide a week or more per year.
There is not a federal law requiring paid sick days in the United States. At least 134 countries have laws setting the maximum length of the work week; the U.S. does not have a maximum work week length and does not place any limits on the amount of overtime that an employee is required to work each week. (survey) Sweden, Denmark and Norway have the highest level of maternity benefits—Sweden provides 68 weeks paid maternity leave, Norway provides 56 weeks paid maternity leave and Denmark provides 52.[28]
American workers average approximately ten paid holidays per year while British workers average twenty-five holidays and German employees thirty. Americans work twelve weeks more a year in total hours than Europeans.[citation needed]
In Europe, the Working Time Regulation has implemented a maximum of forty-eight hours of work per week.[29] Many countries have opted for fewer hours. France attempted to introduce a thirty-five hour workweek, and Finland experimented with a thirty-hour week in 1996.[citation needed] In a 2007, the European Quality of Life Survey found that countries in south-eastern Europe had the most common problems with work-life balance. In Croatia and Greece, a little over 70% of working citizens say that they are too tired to do household jobs at least several times a month because of work.[30]
In Britain, legislation has been passed allowing parents of children under six to request a more flexible work schedule. Companies must approve this request as long as it does not damage the business. A 2003 Survey of graduates in the UK revealed that graduates value flexibility even more than wages.[31]
In all twenty-five European Union countries, voters “punish” politicians who try to shrink vacations. “Even the twenty-two days Estonians, Lithuanians, Poles and Slovenians count as their own is much more generous than the leave allotted to U.S. workers.” [32] According to a report by the Families and Work Institute, the average vacation time that Americans took each year averaged 14.6 days.
Even when vacation time is offered in some U.S. companies, some choose not to take advantage of it. A 2003 survey by Management Recruiter International stated that fifty percent of executives surveyed didn’t have plans to take a vacation. They decided to stay at work and use their vacation time to get caught up on their increased workloads.[32]
[edit] See also
Stress related:
- Burnout (psychology)
- Occupational health psychology
- Psychoneuroimmunology
- Stress (biological)
- Workplace stress
Labour:
Other:
[edit] References
- ^ Publication in: New Ways to Work and the Working Mother's Association in the United Kingdom
- ^ Gerson, Kathleen. Moral Dilemmas, Moral Strategies, and the Transformation of Gender. The Kaleidoscope of Gender, 2011, p. 399.
- ^ a b c d e "Natalie Jolly". http://www.nataliejolly.com. Retrieved 2011-01-25.
- ^ a b c Gerson, Kathleen. Moral Dilemmas, Moral Strategies, and the Transformation of Gender. The Kaleidoscope of Gender, 2011, p. 402.
- ^ Emslie, Carol (2009). "Live to work or work to live?". Harvard Educational Review 16 (1): 151–172.
- ^ Gerbert, Frank (2010): Wenn Arbeit krank macht – Burn-out- das Leiden einer modernen Gesellschaft. Warum die Zahl der Ausgebrannten wächst. In: Focus no. 10/10, p. 92-103
- ^ DESTATIS, Statistisches Bundesamt (Ed.) (2003): Wo bleibt die Zeit? Wiesbaden
- ^ Garhammer, Manfred (2004): Auswirkungen neuer Arbeitsformen auf Stress und Lebensqualität. In: Badura, Bernhard/Schnellschmidt, Henner/Vetter, Christian (Ed.): Fehlzeitenreport 2003, Wettbewerbsfaktor Work-Life-Balance. Berlin
- ^ Badura, Bernhard/Schnellschmidt, Hen-ner/Vetter, Christian (Ed.): Fehlzeitenreport 2003, Wettbewerbsfaktor Work-Life-Balance. Berlin
- ^ Weinert, Ansfried B. (2004): Organisations- und Personalpsychologie. 5. ed. Weinheim
- ^ Reich, Franziska 2010: Raus aus der Perfektions-Falle. In: Stern no. 11, p. 44-54
- ^ Reich, Franziska 2010: Raus aus der Perfektions-Falle. In: Stern no. 11, p. 44-54
- ^ Reich, Franziska 2010: Raus aus der Perfektions-Falle. In: Stern no. 11, p. 44-54
- ^ Poelchau, Nina 2010: Interview: wer lassen kann, wird gelassen. In: Stern no. 11, p. 56
- ^ Gerbert, Frank (2010): Wenn Arbeit krank macht – Burn-out- das Leiden einer modernen Gesellschaft. Warum die Zahl der Ausgebrannten wächst. In: Focus no. 10/10, p. 92-103
- ^ Gerbert, Frank (2010): Wenn Arbeit krank macht – Burn-out- das Leiden einer modernen Gesellschaft. Warum die Zahl der Ausgebrannten wächst. In: Focus no. 10/10, p. 92-103
- ^ Gerbert, Frank (2010): Wenn Arbeit krank macht – Burn-out- das Leiden einer modernen Gesellschaft. Warum die Zahl der Ausgebrannten wächst. In: Focus no. 10/10, p. 92-103
- ^ Gerbert, Frank (2010): Wenn Arbeit krank macht – Burn-out- das Leiden einer modernen Gesellschaft. Warum die Zahl der Ausgebrannten wächst. In: Focus no. 10/10, p. 92-103
- ^ Boersch et al. (2008): Das Summa Summarum der Gesundheit – 20 wichtige Aspekte zu Gesundheit und Wohlbefinden für Manager und Führungskräfte. 1. ed. Frankfurt: Be-triebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler
- ^ Meckel, Miriam (2010): Brief an mein Leben – Erfahrungen mit einem Burnout. 1. ed. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowolt Verlag
- ^ Beck, Sebastian 2009: Die Müdigkeit der Rastlosen. In: Süd-deutsche Zeitung of 03/15/2009
- ^ Reich, Franziska 2010: Raus aus der Perfektions-Falle. In: Stern no. 11, p. 44-54
- ^ Gerbert, Frank (2010): Wenn Arbeit krank macht – Burn-out- das Leiden einer modernen Gesellschaft. Warum die Zahl der Ausgebrannten wächst. In: Focus no. 10/10, p. 92-103
- ^ Gerbert, Frank (2010): Wenn Arbeit krank macht – Burn-out- das Leiden einer modernen Gesellschaft. Warum die Zahl der Ausgebrannten wächst. In: Focus no. 10/10, p. 92-103
- ^ http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1970
- ^ a b http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16907584/
- ^ a b c http://www.msn.com
- ^ http://www.hrmguide.co.uk
- ^ http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/industrialrelations/dictionary/definitions/WORKINGTIME.htm
- ^ http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/qualityoflife/eqls/2007/index.htm
- ^ "More parents to get flexible work". BBC News. 6 April 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7984202.stm.
- ^ a b http://www.ergoweb.com
[edit] Notes
- Gregory, Abigail, Milner, Susan "Work-Life Balance: A Matter of Choice?" Gender, Work & Organization, Vol 16, Issue 1, Pages 1–177.
- Anderson, Jennifer., "Report Highlights Gap Between European and US Vacation Time." Ergoweb, 15 May 2005. retrieved 20 February 2007.
- Barada, Paul W., "Exempt Vs. Nonexempt Workers". retrieved 24 February 2007
- Clark, C S. "Job Stress." CQ Researcher, 4 August 1994. CQ Researcher. Retrieved 1 March 2007 .
- "Effects of Stress." WebMD. 2 June 2005. Healthwise, Incorporated. 3 April 2007.
- Freking, Kevin., "Study Links Child Care to Poor Behavior." ABC News, 26 March 2007. The Walt Disney Company, Retrieved 4 April 2007.
- Fisk, Donald M., "American Labor in the 20th Century.", Compensation and Working Conditions Online. 30 June 2003. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved 4 April 2007.
- Gallitano, Thomas., "Small Necessities Leave Act, Maternity Leave Act". J. CKRP & F. 2007. Conn Kavanaugh Rosenthal Peisch & Ford, LLP. Retrieved 16 February 2007 .
- How extreme is your job? There is a danger of the 70-hour workweek becoming the new standard. Survey, 18 February 2007. Retrieved 18 February 2007.
- Matuska, Kathleen & Christiansen, Charles et al. (eds). Life Balance: Multidisciplinary Theories and Research. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press/Slack Publishers. 2009
- O'Bannon, Brent., "Balance Matters: Turning Burnout Into Balance". R&B Publishing, TX: 2007.
- Paving the Road for Women to Return to Work. Nightly Business Report. PBS. 8 December 2005. Retrieved 3 April 2007 .
- Survey: U.S. Workplace Not Family-Oriented., Forbes, 1 February 2007. Retrieved 17 February 2007.
- The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993., U.S. Department of Labor, 1 March 2007 .
- Wide Variation in European Maternity Benefits., HRM Guide 17 February 2007.
- Whaples, Robert, ed., "Hours of Work in U.S. History". EH.Net Encyclopedia. August 2001. Retrieved 3 April 2007 .
- When It's Just You After School, Kids Health. 2007. The Nemours Foundation. 4 April 2007.
- Work-Life Balance Defined., 2006.
- "Kenexa Research Institute finds that when it comes to work-life balance, men and women are not created equal", Kenexa, July 25, 2007. Accessed May 27, 2008.
- [15]
[edit] External links
- Irish Work-Life Balance
- The Sloan Work and Family Research Network at Boston College
- "Stress...At Work" document and "Working With Stress" video from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
- Working time, gender and work-life balance, Bettina-Johanna Krings et al., Leuven, Belgium, 2009
- The Work-Family Dilemma: A Better Balance (The Barnard Center for Research on Women)
- Leadership Through Worklife Balance (knol contribution by Robin Sharma)
- A Better Way to a Balanced Life
- Comparing the numbers behind work/life balance
- Writings concerning a shorter workweek, with emphasis on its economic impact
- Motivational speaker mixes work and play
- Work Life Balance: Opportunities for SMEs, a video by Eurobalance, a project focused on work-life balance, funded by the European Commission through Leonardo da Vinci Programme.